首页> 外文OA文献 >Pegaptanib Sodium versus Pegaptanib Sodium Combined with Macular Laser Photocoagulation or Laser Alone for Diabetic Macular Edema
【2h】

Pegaptanib Sodium versus Pegaptanib Sodium Combined with Macular Laser Photocoagulation or Laser Alone for Diabetic Macular Edema

机译:培加他尼钠与培加他尼钠联合黄斑激光光凝或单独激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To report the outcomes after primary intravitreal pegaptanib sodium in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. We conduced a retrospective analysis of eyes with DME treated with primary intravitreal pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) (intravitreal pegaptanib group). The results were compared with the ones of eyes treated with intravitreal pegaptanib sodium associated with macular laser photocoagulation (combined treatment group), and the ones of eyes treated with primary macular laser photocoagulation (macular laser photocoagulation group). Results. For the intravitreal pegaptanib group (13 eyes), we found significant changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reductions in mean central macular thickness (CMT) at the last follow-up visit (P = .0014 and P = .0001). For the macular laser photocoagulation group (15 eyes), we found no statistically significant changes in mean BCVA and CMT at the last follow-up visit (P > .05). For the combined treatment group (12 eyes), we found no significant changes in mean BCVA at the last follow-up visit (P > .05) despite significant reductions in mean CMT (P = .0188). Conclusion. Intravitreal pegaptanib treatment alone may be superior to macular laser photocoagulation alone and to combined intravitreal pegaptanib treatment associated with macular laser photocoagulation in patients with DME.
机译:目的。报告糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者原发玻璃体内培加他尼钠治疗后的结局。方法。我们对用原发玻璃体内培加他尼钠(Macugen)(玻璃体内培加他尼组)治疗的DME进行了回顾性分析。将结果与玻璃体内培加他尼钠联合黄斑激光光凝治疗的眼睛(联合治疗组)和原发性黄斑激光光凝治疗的眼睛(黄斑激光凝结组)进行比较。结果。对于玻璃体内培加他尼组(13眼),我们发现在上次随访时平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)发生了显着变化,并且平均黄斑中心厚度(CMT)降低(P = .0014和P =)。 0001)。对于黄斑激光光凝组(15只眼),我们发现在最后一次随访中,平均BCVA和CMT没有统计学上的显着变化(P> .05)。对于联合治疗组(12眼),尽管平均CMT显着降低(P = .0188),但在最后一次随访时,我们发现平均BCVA没有显着变化(P> .05)。结论。在DME患者中,单独的玻璃体内培加他尼治疗可能优于单独的黄斑激光光凝治疗,并且可能优于与黄斑激光光凝治疗相关的玻璃体内培加他尼治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号